





An unpaid invoice becomes harder to recover when the person calling the shots is not the named director. A nominee arrangement can also distance the trading business from the hidden controller with real influence.
Companies House reforms under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act support wider corporate transparency and efforts to reduce financial crime. Mandatory identity verification helps establish that a person on the record is who they claim to be. It won’t prove fraud, establish control in every case or create personal liability for company debts, so assess the result alongside your contract, payment evidence and recovery options.
Companies House identity verification applies to company directors, proposed directors and a person with significant control (PSC). To verify your identity, you may use GOV.UK One Login or, where available, an Authorised Corporate Service Provider (ACSP). You may be asked for photo ID, a biometric passport or other identity documents during digital identity verification.
After completing the process, you receive a personal code. You use that personal code in a filing to link your verified identity with the relevant company role. This may be a legal requirement, and mandatory identity verification can apply beyond ordinary companies, including a limited liability partnership. The official Companies House verification guidance should be checked for current requirements.
The rules seek to deter the misuse of UK companies by making it harder to register or alter corporate details using a false identity. The process helps an individual verify your identity, but it does not let a creditor inspect private identity information. It also does not test whether a company can pay its suppliers, nor does it resolve a dispute over an invoice.
Implementation may include an 18 November 2025 deadline during a transition period. Check the linked official guidance for the date and scope before relying on it, as requirements may change. Non-compliance can affect filings or appointments, and criminal penalties may apply in some circumstances, but a late or inaccurate filing does not automatically lead to prosecution. An ACSP may also have additional anti-money laundering checks and obligations. The term authorised agents is sometimes used in plain English, but the precise legal role matters.
A shadow director is generally someone whose directions or instructions the appointed directors are accustomed to follow, despite that person not appearing as a director. Professional advice alone does not normally make an accountant, solicitor or adviser a shadow director.
A nominee director is a listed director who acts for another person or organisation. Such an arrangement is not automatically unlawful. It may have a legitimate commercial or privacy purpose. Problems arise where a nominee structure supports false filings, conceals control or helps someone misuse a company.

The register has limits. Private agreements may remain private, and a verified record cannot reveal every person influencing daily decisions. Companies House, acting through the Registrar, maintains the register and has stronger powers under the reforms. It is not a debt collector investigating every unpaid invoice. Enforcement bodies may become relevant where there is evidence of serious misconduct.
Verification can make the names on the register more credible, especially when you compare them with director appointments, resignation dates, PSC entries, registered office details and filing history. The UK government’s identity-verification reforms are intended to reduce the scope for anonymous or false company information.
Match those records against your signed contract, invoices, emails, bank details and delivery evidence. For example, a director’s appointment after your goods were supplied may explain why they deny knowledge of the order, but it does not settle liability.
A mismatch deserves investigation. It is not proof of wrongdoing.
Hidden influence can complicate notice service, negotiations and tracing. You may receive payment promises from a person who has no formal role, while the registered director ignores correspondence. That inconsistency matters when deciding who to contact and whether your evidence is complete.
Usually, a limited company is responsible for its own debts. Personal liability needs a separate legal basis, such as an enforceable personal guarantee, fraud, wrongful trading or another recognised claim. Don’t threaten a named director with personal recovery merely because they appear connected to the business.
A Companies House entry can point you towards questions, but your contract and payment evidence determine the debt claim.
Start with the legal entity that placed the order. A trading name, website and email signature can distract from the company name on the contract or invoice. The correct company number is often the quickest way to avoid chasing the wrong business.
Search the company record for its current status, incorporation date, accounts, confirmation statement, director appointments and resignations. Then review the filing history, registered office and PSC information, including each person with significant control.
The Companies House record may show whether an ACSP handled a relevant registration filing. The latest new identity-checking rules explain the requirements for directors and PSCs.
The public register and any identity verification entry are useful evidence checks. They do not prove that the debtor has assets or that someone making payment promises is personally liable.
Pay attention to context rather than isolated facts. Repeated director changes, a sudden change in control, overdue filings, dormant status, strike-off action or insolvency notices may increase risk. A registered office shared by many unrelated companies can also call for closer checks, although it may simply belong to legitimate company formation agents. A shared address is a risk indicator requiring context, not evidence of misconduct.
Record what you find with the date of your search. Compare the register data with contracts, invoices, delivery evidence, emails, bank details and payment promises. Company details can change after you begin recovery, and dated records help explain why you took a particular step.
Before escalating, gather the documents that show both the agreement and the amount due:
Suppose your invoices name “ABC Catering Ltd”, while the buyer’s email signature only says “ABC Events”. The trading name may be harmless, but the registration number and contractual wording show which legal entity owes you. If a nominee appears in emails, retain the messages without assuming they accepted personal responsibility.

### Know when a Companies House concern needs professional help
Seek advice where you suspect false filings, a disputed identity, a hidden controller, insolvency, asset transfers or a debtor that has stopped responding. These issues can affect both the prospect of payment and the safest recovery route.
A responsible referral service can assess the debt’s value, age, location, documents and complexity before introducing a suitable specialist. Commercial Debt Recovery can help you find an appropriate provider for an unpaid business invoice. You remain free to decide whether to appoint any introduced agency.
Legal action should follow a proportionate review. A £750 debt with clear evidence may call for a different response from a disputed six-figure claim against a company facing insolvency.
Identity verification makes false identities harder to use when forming companies or filing changes. That can improve your confidence in the public record. Yet it cannot guarantee payment, confirm that a debtor has assets or turn a company debt into an individual’s debt.
Treat information from the Companies House register as evidence for a commercial decision, not as a verdict. A payment request, letter before action, County Court claim, statutory demand or insolvency route each has legal requirements and commercial risks. The right choice depends on your documents, the debtor’s position and the amount at stake.
A limited company has its own legal identity. Therefore, the company normally owns its assets, signs its contracts and owes its trade debts. A director’s name on the record does not, by itself, create a claim against that person.
Even where completing verification is a legal requirement, that obligation is separate from the legal basis needed to pursue an individual. You may have grounds to do so if they signed a valid guarantee, made a material misrepresentation, committed fraud or engaged in conduct linked to insolvency. Get legal advice before naming an individual in a claim or alleging fraud. Unsupported allegations can create a dispute of their own.
If the company remains active and your evidence is clear, begin with firm, respectful contact and a defined payment deadline. A realistic instalment plan may work where the debtor engages and provides credible payment dates.
Where contact fails, instructing a specialist commercial recovery provider may be appropriate. You may then need to consider a County Court claim or statutory demand, depending on the circumstances. If records show serious financial distress, obtain insolvency advice before spending money on litigation. Avoid harassment, public accusations and contact with unrelated family members or nominees.
The process uses GOV.UK One Login, where applicants are asked to “verify your identity” with photo ID or other identity documents. This identity verification links the individual to relevant roles through a personal code. A creditor can inspect the relevant public register, but cannot access private verification records.
No. A person with significant control has significant ownership or influence under the relevant reporting rules. Day-to-day management may still sit with directors or senior employees. Compare the PSC record with contracts, correspondence and actual decision-making.
A director change does not itself prevent a statutory demand. However, this route has strict requirements and is unsuitable where the debt is genuinely disputed. Take legal advice before using insolvency pressure.
Check whether the address remains current on the register and retain proof of attempted delivery. A solicitor or recovery specialist can advise on valid service and whether another contact address is available from your documents.
You can raise concerns through the relevant Companies House reporting channels. An Authorised Corporate Service Provider (ACSP) may have reporting or filing responsibilities, but is not automatically responsible for the debtor’s invoice. Keep any report factual and provide records supporting your concern. Reporting suspected non-compliance does not pause your invoice claim or guarantee recovery.
Companies House identity verification can make company records more reliable. It may help a creditor identify changes in control, nominee involvement or heightened risk, but cannot replace contractual and payment evidence.
Compare the register with your invoice file, then choose proportionate action based on the debt, evidence and debtor’s financial position. Early, proportionate action and specialist support can improve your prospects of recovery without making unsupported personal allegations.
Category :
Share :